Debate About Governance and Equality

The debate about governance and equality has been going on for a long time, with a particular focus on the rights and roles of women compared to those of males.

On the one hand, the notion that males have traditionally mistreated women has a rich biological and psychological history. On the other side, it might be claimed that men’s lack of understanding of women is why women are oppressed.

The second statement is more upbeat. After all, it places some optimism in the power of education and persuasion to change the situation. In contrast, the first statement is pessimistic because it implies that the condition cannot be changed.

Beyond gender roles, several social institutions have made empty promises of equality and democracy. The result has been a long line of lies that expand the equality gap even further.

A female figure named Folly is employed in Desiderius Erasmus’ comedy In Praise of Folly to highlight the inconsistencies and flaws in the behavior of church officials following the institutionalization of Christianity. The book In Praise of Folly addresses several important topics, including the efficacy of saints, the efficacy of indulgences and their purchasers, the role of priests in popularizing saints and indulgences, the debates held by scholastic theologians, and the monks’ activities in comparison to Christ’s teachings.

On the other side, utopia is an attempt to picture a society in which everyone will be treated equally, where items will be shared in public, and where everyone will have access to freedom. In this new society, it is anticipated that everyone will be content with their lot in life and that common property ownership will finally result in abundance.

The first section of the two works describes a society with rigid requirements for obtaining happiness. It is expected that everyone will be treated equally and that gender distinction won’t exist.

The two works also denounced the dependence on professors as the most qualified candidates for government roles. Erasmus, for instance, views philosophers as ridiculous, incompetent, and self-congratulatory to be able to rule any form of the province in a book.

Folly contends that in this situation, because philosophers and theologians tend to be reserved and somber, their personalities and actions do not enhance social gatherings.

Folly’s praise provides a clear picture of the humanistic changes and their impacts on society. This serves as a deterrent to reform and sheds light on life’s ongoing issues.

More importantly, the author is determined to draw attention to the issues with institutionalized changes, such as the situation where Christians are led astray by false information and are led astray by the truth.

Analysis of Epistle 47 by Seneca

Analysis of Epistle 47 by Seneca – Seneca makes a strong argument on slavery and the treatment of the slaves in Epistle 47. The letter emphasizes the brutal treatment slaves were experiencing at the hands of their Roman owners.

Seneca defends slaves by claiming that their souls are identical to those of free people. As a result, he implores the Romans to treat slaves according to their character and unique virtues rather than according to their social station.

The text is particularly significant because Seneca puts out a very audacious and brilliant notion that the aristocracy of his time largely disregarded or despised. Because slaves were viewed as lower-class humans at the time, it was common to treat them badly.

Rich and aristocratic Romans sought friendship with other nobility and seldom looked down on their slaves who mistreated them. In his letter, Seneca expresses opposition to this.

He demonstrates how much better treated their slaves than their descendants were the forefathers of his fellow Romans, who could discriminate between personality and status.

Seneca believed that slaves and aristocrats should be treated equally because both groups had sentiments and qualities.

It’s interesting to note that Seneca criticizes the treatment of slaves rather than slavery as a concept. Seneca views slavery as only a matter of chance; in his letter, he talks about many noblemen who were reduced to slavery due to certain conflicts and attacks; as a result, even some of the older noble people were reduced to slavery at an advanced age.

Seneca, therefore, supports treating slaves as free people rather than opposing the capture and use of slaves.

Seneca illustrates that no one was safe from becoming a slave in Roman society since there were ongoing fights and the possibility of losing one’s riches and social status instantly when he advises the reader to respect his master.

As a result, the letter’s lesson is to treat slaves with respect because everyone can become a slave. This includes treating them with the dignity and respect they deserve, as well as with the same human ideals and attributes.

It is challenging to deny the significance and influence of Seneca’s writings. He can offer his peers fresh ideas and deliver significant messages, all while arguing for the validity of those ideas using persuasive arguments.

Due to the message it contained, the letter was very important for Seneca’s contemporaries, just as the work is still very relevant now.

Although modern society has successfully fought and eradicated slavery, racial and socioeconomic biases persist. Social biases are what are connected to Seneca’s letter.

People today also tend to create friendships and connections with others who share their social and political views.

Mass Media and Teenagers Essay

Mass Media and Teenagers Essay – Researchers have discovered a direct link between exposure to violent media and aggressive behavior among youths in high-risk groups.

By the middle of the 20th century, almost 50% of Americans had access to television. Today, 99% of American families have a TV in their house. In the bedrooms of many teens, there are televisions and laptops. This fact frequently causes unrestrained TV viewing.

Mass Media and Teenagers Essay

According to experts, adolescents watch television for roughly 28 hours each week. Most teenagers spend less time in school than they do enjoying TV shows. The average American youngster, according to Beresin, “will see more than 200,000 acts of violence, including more than 16,000 killings before the age of 18.”

Television shows feature roughly 812 violent acts every hour, according to data. Furthermore, even children’s television shows like cartoons air roughly 20 instances of abusive conduct per hour.

Children and teens mimic the actions they see in movies and role-play them with their peers. Children under the age of four cannot tell the difference between the images of real-world events and those shown in movies and cartoons.

This may cause them to view violent acts as the exception rather than the rule. Beresin focuses on using violence as a common response to difficult day-to-day circumstances.

Many well-known movies and video games include crazy and aggressive main characters. They own a gun and utilize it during fights. Furthermore, they receive rewards for their abnormal actions.

As a result, the aforementioned behavior has come to represent appropriate behavior for contemporary teenagers. Then, any proposal is presented to the kids. They lose empathy for the pain of others.