Sample Thesis Paper
A fresh look at death penalty statutes should invite consideration of a wealth of additional legislative reforms. Both state commissions (e.g., the Capital Case Commission in Arizona, the Illinois Governor’s Commission on Capital Punishment, the Indiana Criminal Law Study Commission, and the JLARC in Virginia) and scholars have called for careful reexamination of the reach of capital punishment legislation and corresponding statutory procedural safeguards. A host of statutory issues should be revisited in light of the states’ experiences with the death penalty and burgeoning capital punishment scholarship, including definitions of capital murder, the specification of aggravating and mitigating factors, evidentiary matters, sentencing procedures, and competency for execution, among others.
Juvenile Justice System in American law
Juveniles in America, who commit crimes, can be charged like adults, with a felony, a misdemeanor, or an infraction. Juvenile crime or criminal behavior is the legal term for behavior of kids and adolescents, under the age of eighteen that in adults would be considered to be criminal by law. Under certain circumstances, youthful offenders can be tried as juveniles or adults. Generally, any individual age eighteen or over is considered an adult and treated as such. From the law enforcement standpoint. Juvenile law became effective during 19th century. According to juvenile law, juveniles are usually not guilty of criminal activities, and there is a need of safety and protection for them than that for adults. It was 1800’s when the law for juveniles was made to release junior offenders from lockups and defend them from criminal trials and its negative consequences on them.