Sample Thesis Paper
There are of course objections to the theories of compatibilism. One of the principle arguments for incompatibilism comes from Carl Ginet. The argument given by him states that the power of an individual to affect change does not extend to factors such as those of nature that are by their very nature unchangeable. And if a certain fact affects a person directly and the consequences of that fact exist than the person will be affected by the consequences of that fact as well. Thus in the face of these facts determinism becomes true and since no one can change the facts that cause the situation, no one can affect the future (McKenna, 2004).
It is also prudent, when thinking about the choices an individual can make, to consider that he might also have the ability to choose between more than one courses of action. It states that the freedom that is primarily granted to individuals can manifest in the form of having at least two choices in a situation. One natural way in which these choices are modeled is as assessing the future of an individual as a fork in the garden, considered the future, which comes from a single source, the past. The choices made by these individuals are contingent upon their ability to make these choices. If we consider determinism to be true then this choice is simply not available to the individual and only one future is possible while without it a person who has a will can make a choice creating more than one possible future (Ragland, 2006).