Thesis: Stem Cell Research

Sample Thesis Paper

Over time, a large number of articles, journals and books have been written on Stem Cell Research and the amount of literature now available on the subject of Stem Cell research and the numerous intricacies that are involved in the area of stem cell research in the present era. The following paragraphs shall shed light upon the article Two Steps Forward: Keeping the momentum in Stem Cell Research published in April 2004 edition of the journal Stem Cells and written by Jamie Palaganas of the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at John Hopkins Baltimore and Curt I. Civin who is the editor in chief of Stem Cells. Further on in the paper, the case at hand will be shed light upon in the perspective presented by Audrey R. Chapman, Mark S. Frankel and Michele S. Garfinkel in Stem Cell Research and Applications. Monitoring the Frontiers of Biomedical Research to strengthen the standing of the paper.
This article is by no means one that is simply meant to become a part of the immense volume of literature on stem cell research, but is of a nature that can best be referred to as a conclusion drawn from a number of different research studies. These include Two Fillips for human embryonic stem cells by Phimister and Drazen, New human embryonic stem-cell lines—more is better by Gearhart, Science, politics and Federal Advisory Committees by Steinbrook and Bioethics and the political distortion of biomedical science by Blackburn. These studies were performed in the same areas that the subject article covers and it is imperative to note that the core base of the article is one that has been a heated debate for quite some time now.

Over time, a large number of articles, journals and books have been written on Stem Cell Research and the amount of literature now available on the subject of Stem Cell research and the numerous intricacies that are involved in the area of stem cell research in the present era. The following paragraphs shall shed light upon the article Two Steps Forward: Keeping the momentum in Stem Cell Research published in April 2004 edition of the journal Stem Cells and written by Jamie Palaganas of the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at John Hopkins Baltimore and Curt I. Civin who is the editor in chief of Stem Cells. Further on in the paper, the case at hand will be shed light upon in the perspective presented by Audrey R. Chapman, Mark S. Frankel and Michele S. Garfinkel in Stem Cell Research and Applications. Monitoring the Frontiers of Biomedical Research to strengthen the standing of the paper.This article is by no means one that is simply meant to become a part of the immense volume of literature on stem cell research, but is of a nature that can best be referred to as a conclusion drawn from a number of different research studies. These include Two Fillips for human embryonic stem cells by Phimister and Drazen, New human embryonic stem-cell lines—more is better by Gearhart, Science, politics and Federal Advisory Committees by Steinbrook and Bioethics and the political distortion of biomedical science by Blackburn. These studies were performed in the same areas that the subject article covers and it is imperative to note that the core base of the article is one that has been a heated debate for quite some time now.

Please order custom thesis paper, dissertation, term paper, research paper, essay, book report, case study from the Order Now page.